3-D mammography is the latest innovation in breast cancer screening technology, but how is it different from traditional 2-D screening? Here’s what you need to know.
Mammograms have been a mainstay in breast cancer screening for a long time, and for good reason: Early detection can save lives. A mammogram, or X-ray image of the breast, is able to detect breast cancer before any signs or symptoms appear, and it can reveal tumors that might not be felt in a physical breast exam.
But, like most things in life, mammography isn’t perfect. Among the most common concerns are false-positive results, overdiagnosis (and consequent overtreatment) and false-negative results. However, as mammography technology advances, it’s becoming more and more precise. That’s where 3-D mammography comes in.
How the technology evolved
Over the decades, mammography has changed dramatically.
Call for an Appointment
(800) USC-CARE (800-872-2273)
“Originally, we took an X-ray of the breast and essentially got a photograph,” says Pulin A. Sheth, MD, a breast radiologist and director of breast imaging at Keck Medicine of USC and an assistant professor of clinical radiology at the Keck School of Medicine of USC. “We would then shine a light through the photograph, as you would with a light box, and see what was visible. As one can imagine, there were so many limitations with that early technology.”
Sheth explains that digital mammography, or 2-D mammography, became the next standard of care. Compared to the old analog technology, this newer digital technology, also known as full-field digital mammography, significantly improved the resolution of the picture.
The latest evolution is what is referred to as 3-D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, or, simply, tomosynthesis, Sheth explains. “Basically, the machine takes several fractionated images of the compressed breast at different angles, then reprocesses those images into sequential ‘slices,’ thereby reconstructing the breast into a 3-D data set.”
Are the results that much better?
“The answer is unequivocally yes,” Sheth says. “Think of a standard 2-D mammogram as a circle drawn on paper, whereas 3-D mammography gives you a sphere. The viewer now gets a far better sense of the size, margins (or borders) and depth and can see through the breast tissues.”
He explains that studies have shown 3-D mammography both increases the detection of small, early, treatable cancers and simultaneously decreases the false positives, or unnecessary callbacks. Furthermore, a 3-D mammogram can help identify tumors that may not, at first, look particularly suspicious in 2-D.
One other way that 2-D and 3-D mammograms differ is the amount of radiation exposure. Because a 3-D mammogram involves more X-rays, it may expose patients to more radiation; however, as Sheth notes, the radiation dose is minimal and well within established safety guidelines. In fact, 3-D mammography has the potential to limit radiation exposure by decreasing unnecessary callbacks and additional views.
“There’s little doubt that 3-D mammograms are a significant step forward,” he says. “They’re a generational leap in the early detection of breast cancer.”
by Deanna Pai